Q: So you guys are Anarchists?

A: From a substance point of view, yes, agorists must be Anarchists supportive of voluntary association, or rather they must reject any form of initiated aggression or violence - they must reject the violent and coercive state. As agorists largely support an economic system of individual cooperation and freedom, they are most should be considered Anarchists in the classical sense of the word.

From a semantics point of view, however, it has been expressed by philosophers, such as Robert LeFevre, that Anarchism is not the proper etymological reference for a libertarian, but rather libertarians must consider themselves Autarchists - maintaining a position of self-rule. Though this interpretation of Autarchism vs. Anarchism may be etymologically correct, however, from the layman point of view, and the general sentiment of most libertarian-anarchist/autarchists, Anarchism is a fine enough definition for libertarians to take, as it maintains a position of rejecting external authority on this earth.